pexels-timmossholder-383640
Picture of Ed Moseby

Ed Moseby

We Should Be Putting the Environment Ahead of Economic Growth

In a world obsessed with economic expansion, GDP growth, and quarterly profits, we have lost sight of a fundamental truth: without a healthy planet, no economy can survive. It’s time to stop treating environmental sustainability as an afterthought or a luxury, and instead place it firmly in front of unchecked economic growth. If we continue on this trajectory, the cost of climate inaction will far outweigh the benefits of short-term economic gains.

The Myth of Infinite Growth in a Finite World

The prevailing assumption that the economy must grow continuously to be deemed “healthy” is flawed and, frankly, dangerous. The Earth’s resources are not infinite. Forests, clean water, and fossil fuels—once they are depleted, there is no getting them back. Yet we treat them as commodities to be exploited for the sake of corporate profits. The fossil fuel industry alone continues to make record profits while spewing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, exacerbating climate change. Meanwhile, global deforestation is happening at an alarming rate, with over 15 billion trees cut down each year, threatening biodiversity and destabilizing ecosystems .

Climate Change is Already Hitting Our Wallets

Prioritizing economic growth over environmental health is a short-sighted strategy that is already costing us dearly. The idea that sustainable policies kill jobs or hurt industries is a smokescreen. The reality is that extreme weather events, driven by climate change, are draining economies worldwide. In 2022 alone, climate-related disasters cost the U.S. economy $165 billion. Hurricanes, floods, and wildfires not only devastate communities but also disrupt supply chains, destroy infrastructure, and increase insurance premiums . The economic losses we suffer from ignoring climate action will only compound in the years to come.

Furthermore, renewable energy industries—solar, wind, and electric vehicles—are consistently outperforming fossil fuels in terms of job creation and innovation. In the U.S., there are now more workers in clean energy sectors than in coal mining. Transitioning to a green economy isn’t just better for the planet; it’s an economic opportunity waiting to be seized.

Public Health Costs: An Overlooked Tab

While we’re busy measuring economic “progress,” we’re failing to consider the public health implications of environmental degradation. Air pollution alone, a byproduct of industrial activity, kills an estimated 7 million people globally each year. It contributes to respiratory diseases, heart conditions, and even cognitive decline in children. Who foots the bill for these health problems? Taxpayers. In the U.S., health-related costs due to air pollution are estimated to be between $77 billion and $162 billion annually. This is not counting the untold suffering and lives cut short .

We must face a difficult reality: prioritizing GDP growth over environmental stewardship is effectively placing a higher value on short-term profits than on human lives.

Environmental Stability is Security

If the current state of the world teaches us anything, it’s that environmental instability is directly tied to global security. As climate change accelerates, we’re already seeing the ramifications: water scarcity, food shortages, and mass migration. These are not hypothetical scenarios—they’re already happening. Africa’s Sahel region is experiencing record droughts, displacing millions. Meanwhile, rising sea levels are threatening to submerge entire island nations like the Maldives and Kiribati, which will lead to increased global tensions as displaced populations seek refuge .

The Pentagon has labeled climate change a “threat multiplier,” recognizing its role in exacerbating conflicts and destabilizing entire regions. Yet, the global response remains lukewarm at best. Prioritizing environmental sustainability isn’t just an ethical choice; it’s a necessary strategy for maintaining global peace and security.

The False Dichotomy: Economy vs. Environment

The narrative that pits environmental action against economic growth is not only false but perilous. Sustainable economic models show that environmental conservation and economic prosperity can go hand-in-hand. Countries like Germany and Denmark have transitioned significant portions of their economies to renewable energy without sacrificing growth or competitiveness. Their economies are thriving while their carbon footprints shrink.

What we need is a shift in mindset—a departure from the notion that economic success must come at the expense of the planet. Green technologies, circular economies, and sustainable agriculture are just a few examples of how we can create jobs, build wealth, and enhance quality of life without further endangering the environment.

Conclusion: Prioritize the Planet, Prosperity Will Follow

We need to put the environment ahead of economic growth—not just because it’s the right thing to do, but because it’s the only rational choice. Without a stable environment, our economies, societies, and very way of life will collapse. It’s time to challenge the dangerous myth of infinite growth and embrace a future where sustainability and prosperity are not at odds, but mutually reinforcing.

Let’s stop treating the planet as an afterthought and recognize it for what it truly is: the foundation of everything we hold dear. The health of our economy, our security, and our very existence depends on it.

This article pushes for a paradigm shift, making it clear that we cannot continue to prioritize short-term economic growth at the expense of long-term environmental sustainability. The consequences of inaction are too severe to ignore, and a healthy planet must be the foundation of any meaningful progress.

Share this post